Public Services

The Carillion carousel

Jessica Figueras Published 23 January 2018

Remember the government IT strategy driven by GDS in its pomp? Disaggregation, SMEs, a more intelligent customer, more work in-house. In the wake of Carillion, could a similar sea change affect other public sector contracting markets?

 

Pity Oliver Dowden MP, whose ministerial promotion was rewarded with an immediate kicking from Newsnight over Carillion . Dowden has picked up most of what used to be the Cabinet Office efficiency and reform brief, although his experience as a PR man and SPAD seems hardly more relevant to digital than Caroline Nokes' ponies. But as David Cameron's ex-deputy chief of staff he must have some political nous, which could help as GDS is pulled into Brexit coordination along with the rest of Cabinet Office.

The Carillion fiasco is chilling for those at the larger end of the public sector contracting market. Not because others are poised to follow Carillion off the cliff, but because the story is fuelling increasingly anti-outsourcing political rhetoric . Corbyn's talk of nationalisation might sound terrifying, but it's more immediately significant that Bernard Jenkin MP is questioning the nature of private sector involvement. As a Brexiter Tory MP, and Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, it's voices like his setting the political wind - and they are not talking up the free market.

How relevant is all of this to IT contracts? IT outsourcing doesn't generally suffer the same race to the bottom that bedevils the most people-intensive BPO and construction markets, in which contract costs go up and margins down. Rail franchises suffer the same problem, for that matter. The outcome for contracts that blow up tends to be some combination of sub-standard public service, supplier failure or taxpayer bailout. Remedies currently proposed by those including Jenkin are more oversight of large suppliers, increased use of smaller suppliers, and better contract management. (Some work will probably be taken back in-house too, but we can safely predict that no one will call it 'nationalisation').

Sound familiar? Think back to the government IT strategy driven by GDS in its pomp. Disaggregation, SMEs, becoming a more intelligent customer, doing more work in-house. Five years later all of this is run-of-the-mill stuff. In time, it's not inconceivable that similar could be applied to other public sector contracting markets. Suppliers who've developed expertise in the full range of SIAM-type services and transition support could find themselves much in demand.


Jessica Figueras

Comments

Post a comment

Comments may be moderated for spam, obscenities or defamation.







We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.